Massachusetts Law About Burial, Cremation and Funerals
- MGL c.114: Cemeteries and Burials. The state's primary cemetery, burial and cremation law.
- MGL c.7, s.38A: Skeletal remains; preservation; excavation; analysis. Handling possible American Indian remains
- MGL c.9, s.26A: State archeologist; duties; reservation of lands from sale; cooperation of governmental agencies
- MGL c.9, s.27C: Requirements to notify state archeologist if remains are found during public construction project.
- MGL c.38, § 6: Unmarked human skeletal remains; notice to office of chief medical examiner; inquiry; notification of commission on Indian affairs
- MGL c.46, § 9: Death certificates; issuance; contents; declaration of death by nurse, nurse practitioner or physician's assistant. Describes the procedure for issuance of death certificates.
- MGL c.114, s.43M: Cremation Remains. Amended in 2008 to authorize funeral establishments to dispose of cremated remains that have not been claimed within 12 months of cremation. The funeral establishment must keep permanent records.
- MGL c.190B, s.3-701. Prior to appointment, a person named executor in a will may carry out written instructions of the decedent relating to the decedent's body, funeral and burial arrangements.
- MGL. c. 272 s. 42: Disturbance of Funerals: Whoever wilfully interrupts or by fast driving or otherwise in any way disturbs a funeral assembly or procession shall be punished as provided in section forty.
- MGL c. 272 s.40: Disturbance of Schools or Assemblies: Penalty for disturbing an assembly (funeral).
- 239 CMR: Rules and Regulations Governing Funeral Directors and Embalmers
- 505 CMR 1: Disclosure of Autopsy Reports
- 505 CMR 2: Release of Unclaimed or Unidentified Bodies
- 505 CMR 4: Cremation Fees
Burial and Cremation, Mass. Dept. of Public Health, Division of Community Sanitation. Includes detailed information about requirements for burial and cremation, including transportation, preparation of the body and more.
Burying Mass Murderers: The Problem of Tamerlan Tsarnaev, Huffington Post, May 2013. Excellent overview of Mass. burial laws, and the challenges facing difficult situations. "If the family of Tamerlan Tsarnaev rejects cremation as an option, then it will likely find that Massachusetts law will provide little assistance in securing a burial place for him."
Caring For Your Own Dead: Guidelines for Burial or Cremation Without a Funeral Director, Funeral Consumers Alliance of Eastern Massachusetts. Extremely helpful information about the process, even if you don't plan to do it yourself.
Caring For Your Own Procedures: Highlighting required forms, upon death in MA, Funeral Consumers Alliance of Eastern Massachusetts.
Consumer's Guide to Planning a Funeral, Board of Registration of Embalmers and Funeral Directors. Provides consumer guidelines for Purchasing Funeral Arrangements and Pre-Paid ("Pre-Need") Funeral Arrangements.
Death Registration Fact Book, Mass. Registry of Vital Records and Statistics, 2006. Provides detailed instructions on preparing a death certificate, for funeral directors or others acting in that capacity.
Frequently Asked Questions About Inquests, Boston Herald. Attribution is unclear, but we believe this was written by the District Court Dept. Explains how the inquest process works.
Funerals: A Consumer Guide, Federal Trade Commission. Detailed guide on issues confronting consumers. Includes funeral planning, costs, a form to use in comparing costs, and consumer rights under the "funeral rule."
Veterans' Guide to Benefits: Burial Benefits, Mass. Secretary of State. Explains eligibility for burial in state and federal veterans' cemeteries and the application procedure.
What to Do When Human Burials are Accidentally Uncovered: Know How #4, Mass. Historical Commission. What you should do if you uncover bones, and the role of the state archaeologist.
Burial at Sea in New England, Environmental Protection Agency. Contains guidance in how to conduct a burial at sea and reporting requirements.
A Final Resting Place at Sea: As Cremations Rise, Ocean Burials Also Gain, Boston Globe, January 20, 2011. Explains the increasing number of burials at sea, and some options for those considering it.
Conservationists Push for "Green Burial," Boston Globe, August 26, 2006. Describes one effort to create a space for the "earth-friendly burial of ashes or of unembalmed bodies in biodegradable boxes or in shrouds."
Going Green, Boston Globe, March 1, 2009. In a profile of one company making green caskets, this article describes green burial options at some length.
Massachusetts Environmental Law, MCLE, loose-leaf. Chapter 6: Cemetery Laws and Burial Laws.
Brown v. Bayview Crematory, LLC, 79 Mass. App. Ct. 337 (2011). Jury could find that "plaintiffs suffered injury due to mental distress occasioned by the defendant's handling of the remains of the plaintiffs' mother...even where the jury found that the plaintiffs did not suffer sufficient physical manifestation or objective symptoms to recover for negligently inflicted emotional distress."
Burney v. Childrens Hospital, 169 Mass. 57 (1897). Discusses the right to possession of a body for the purpose of burial.
LaCava v. Lucander, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 527 (2003). "The right to be buried in a cemetery of one's choosing is [not] a fundamental right for purposes of equal protection."
LeBlanc v. Commonwealth, 457 Mass. 94 (2010). Where there was understandable confusion about whether a body released to parents was the correct body, but in fact there was no error, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner had no obligation to tell the family that the autopsy report had been corrected and that the body was in fact that of their son.
O'Dea v. Mitchell, 350 Mass. 163 (1966). "The plaintiffs' standing rests on the statement that they are "next of kin" to the decedent, and therefore have the right to possession of the decedent's body. That right vests, however, in the next of kin only when there is no surviving spouse or no contrary provision by the decedent concerning the disposition of his remains."
Silva v. Attleboro, 454 Mass. 165 (2009) A Superior Court judge did not err in holding that monetary charges imposed by certain municipalities for the issuance of burial permits were valid regulatory fees rather than improper taxes, where the charges were reasonably proportional to the amounts expended by the local boards of health in administering the permit process, and were charged in exchange for a particular governmental service benefiting the party paying the charge, that is, a well-regulated industry for the disposal of human remains.